US-Saudi F-35 Deal and Regional Military Balance

The approval of F-35 fighter jet sales to Saudi Arabia raises concerns about Israel's military edge and shifts in regional security dynamics.

Why This Matters

Military sales and their effects on international relationships trigger significant public interest due to security implications.

Public Sentiment Summary

Public opinion is largely negative and skeptical regarding the F-35 deal with Saudi Arabia. Key concerns include the implications for regional stability, ethical and humanitarian issues stemming from past events like the Khashoggi incident and the 9/11 attacks, and doubts about US intentions and the overall security risks associated with transferring advanced technology to a nation perceived as a threat. Many commenters express frustration over prioritizing military sales over pressing humanitarian issues.

Highlighted Comments

While his brothers and sisters are dying with starvation he is giving money to buy arms.

F35 are sold to saudi to attack Yemen and maybe Iran later only.

It’s a dumb move. They would sell the tech to China overnight.

How many more Americans do Saudis need to kill?

Parties Involved

  • United States Government
  • Saudi Arabia
  • International Human Rights Organizations
  • Congress

What the people want

United States Government: Prioritize ethical standards and humanitarian concerns over military profits.

Saudi Arabia: Reflect on your human rights record before receiving advanced military technology.

Congress: Take a stand to prevent arms sales that may contribute to regional instability and violence.